THE ENVIRONMENT BILL - PROPOSED LEGISLATION FOR CONSERVATION COVENANTS

Among the talk about natural capital and environmental standards, the Environment Bill 2019 sets out how the government will build on the 25 Year Environment Plan. It is currently awaiting its progression through the House of Commons following December’s general election.
Correct at time of going to print in 2020

One aspect of the Bill is the proposed introduction of legislation for conservation covenants. These are private and voluntary agreements between a landowner and a responsible body, such as a conservation charity, allowing for positive or restrictive obligations to fulfil a conservation objective.

These covenants are attached to the land itself so, should the land change hands, they would continue to bind future landowners. The intention is for the parties to be free to negotiate terms to suit their specific circumstances and requirements, including the length of time that the covenant would apply.

Currently the only parties permitted to enforce covenants are the adjacent landowner(s) and the National Trust, but the government is looking at amending this. It is proposed that charities and possibly registered for-profit bodies, will be able to apply to the Secretary of State to be accredited as responsible bodies.

WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF USING SUCH COVENANTS?

Firstly, it will provide a long-term and robust mechanism for ensuring biodiversity net gain during development, a requirement under the NPPF (National Planning Policy Framework). It is supposed that one use of these covenants will be by developers or infrastructure projects (such as Heathrow for example) as a means of facilitating development by securing compensatory habitat creation elsewhere.

Using a conservation covenant, a developer would be able to facilitate the required environmental improvements to natural capital by paying a landowner to implement a change on their land to leave the environment in a measurably better state, and by paying a responsible body to accept, monitor and enforce the covenant.

In this case, the covenant would stipulate future land use protocols or management systems. The land would not need to be owned by the responsible body.

This would be just one way for a developer to secure the required biodiversity net gain, and landowners may find that another route would allow them more flexibility in terms and duration.

Secondly, an alternative and more philanthropic use will see such covenants being created by existing landowners or benefactors looking to create lasting legacies. A conservation covenant could be created in order to secure an environmental benefit to natural capital that accords with their own beliefs and objectives, such as enduring organic status or the creation of particular habitats to encourage biological diversity. As the land is passed through generations or bought and sold, the limitations on the way the land can be used and exploited will remain.

Thirdly, it is also possible that corporate polluting organisations could seek to enhance their environmental principles and off-set their carbon or other emissions by entering into these covenants.

Concerns have been raised regarding the ongoing funding and maintenance required to comply with covenants into the future, and who should be responsible. Landowners will need to consider very carefully the impact of such covenants long in to the future and responsible bodies will need to ensure that they have the management skills and resources to manage and enforce them. Those considering offering biodiversity offsetting should also look carefully into whether the short-term increase in income is sufficient to counterbalance any loss of (potential) value in the long term.

The requirement to offset biodiversity losses is likely to become a routine requirement when a habitat or natural resource is adversely impacted by development. Carter Jonas, with a rural team who manages over a million acres of land throughout the UK, and a planning and development team advising on 23,000 acres of development land, is well-placed to provide proactive advice to enable developers and landowners to work together to mutual benefit. 

For more information, contact Mark Russell, Partner, on mark.russell@carterjonas.co.uk or 01223 346628.