Reformation of subsidy schemes To ‘Restore Confidence’ to renewable energy industry
Date of Article
Feb 13 2012

Keep informed

Sign up to our newsletter to receive further information and news tailored to you.

Sign up now

DECC announcement reveals further cuts to Feed-in Tariffs under the consultation for the comprehensive review.

London, 11 February 2012, The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) this week announced long awaited ‘improvements’ to the Feed-in Tariff (FiT) in a bid to create more ‘transparency, longevity and certainty’ and restore confidence in the solar PV sector.

Climate Change Minister Greg Barker commented, "Our new plans will see almost two and a half times more installations than originally projected by 2015 which is good news for the sustainable growth of the industry.

"We are proposing a more predictable and transparent scheme as the costs of technologies fall, ensuring a long-term, predictable rate of return that will closely track changes in prices and deployment."
Since the Feed–in Tariff (FiT) was first introduced in April 2010, rash announcements and premature reviews of solar PV by DECC have created furor within the industry and left investors reeling.  This week’s announcement of the potential revised rates under the Government’s consultation on the comprehensive review only added insult to injury as DECC set out proposals that could see further cuts to the subsidy scheme from April onwards on a regular basis.

The Feed–in Tariffs (FiT), were set up by the Government to encourage the deployment of renewable energy technologies (in technology bandings up to 5MW of generating capacity) initially spurred a ‘gold rush’ effect as investors saw the financial benefits of installing solar PV technology. And given that it is relatively straightforward to develop compared to other renewable energy technologies, the deployment of PV in the UK soared.

This placed a huge strain on the Government’s FiT budget and in October 2011 they were forced to take drastic action and announced premature cuts to subsidies in an effort to curb future deployment.  This decision was challenged by leading solar PV companies who took the case to the High Court, which ruled the ‘panic’ cuts potentially illegal and DECC may now appeal to the Supreme Court and has until 21st February to lodge its case. Therefore the Government cannot give certainty on tariff levels to people who install PV between 12 December 2011 and 3 March 2012.

The consultation has been split into two parts: Phase 2A: Solar PV cost control, whilst other non–PV technologies will be dealt with under Phase 2B. (For full details, see here:

To illustrate the proposed changes, if we look at the PV banding for a retrofit sub 4kW scheme, when the FiT was first introduced the generation tariff was set at 41.3p/kWh and by October 2012 it will have declined further to 12.9p/kWh under Option A, 14.7p/kWh under Option B and 15.7p/kWh if Option C is adopted, from the reduced rates at 1 April 2012, with further degression thereafter.

Turning to Phase 2B of the Feed-in Tariff Comprehensive Review covering non PV technologies, (For full details, see here:
it is proposed that the new rates for Phase 2B will take effect from 1 October 2012, as compared to 1 April 2012 for Phase 2A, which leads one to query; whether DECC is concerned about their paucity for successful legal action, bearing in mind the solar PV Feed-in Tariff fiasco.

The Phase 2B Consultation is open until 26 April 2012 and the proposed rates suggest an upper limit of 21p/kWh. There is also a proposed automatic degression of rates when uptake exceeds ‘capacity triggers’ to protect future budgets (5 per cent  per annum from 2014).

Andrew Watkin, head of the Carter Jonas Energy and Marine Team comments,

“This is a disappointing outcome for the UK solar PV industry. The proposed alterations to FiT rates, are likely to result in increased unemployment and business failures in that sector, due to the tight timescale and much reduced tariff levels going forward, unless there is a major and expedient price alteration in Capex terms, which seems unlikely”.

“In order for the industry to be sustainable, the proposed cuts in the tariff rate will necessitate further significant reductions of installer price to achieve a reasonable level of return – it’s probably “all too far and too fast’”

“With regard to non pv technologies such as hydro, AD and wind, these are generally more constrained in terms of development potential i.e. planning issues and are more site specific in project development terms making deployment more difficult as compared to solar PV. Such technologies appear to have a future in the UK renewables sector under the FiT, which is re-assuring especially as we have natural resources including topography, rainfall, and wind speeds to tick some of the respective technology requirements to drive a successful project forward!”

“It will be interesting to see whether the alternative support mechanism for renewable energy technologies under the RO (Renewables Obligation) for which the response to the recent consultation is awaited, alters the bandings to mirror the FiT proposals, for that we shall have to wait a little longer, before the outcome is announced”.

For press information contact Gemma Haimes, head of PR, Carter Jonas, 020 7298 1822